Abandoning your morals for a chance at life

When people approach a religious text or any large book from which they intend to derive ethical teachings, nearly without exception the person will pick up the book and pay very particular attention to all the morals they already agree with. The philosopher George Smith says that " Christian theologians have a strong tendency to read their own moral convictions into the ethics of Jesus.

Abandoning your morals for a chance at life

While I hope to work with the editor for a future re-write, here is the original piece for your reading: How about Secularists for Sharia Law? To be an atheist is to support abortion. She also seriously misheard and misconstrued the point of my green banana analogy!

But we do exist. The late atheist author Christopher Hitchenswhen asked in a January debate with Jay Wesley Richards whether he was opposed to abortion and was a member of the pro-life movement, replied: All the discoveries of embryology [and viability] — which have been very considerable in the last generation or so — appear to confirm that opinion, which I think should be innate in everybody.

Abortion, The Complex Issue? Abortion is an emotionally complex issue, stacked with distressing circumstances that elicit our sympathy and compassion, but abortion is not morally complex: If the preborn are not human beings equally worthy of our compassion and support, no justification for abortion is required.

Women should maintain full autonomy over their bodies and make their own decisions about their pregnancies.

Abandoning your morals for a chance at life

However, if the preborn are human beings, no justification for abortion is morally adequate, if such a reason cannot justify ending the life of a toddler or any born human in similar circumstances. Would we dismember a young preschooler if there were indications she might grow up in an abusive home?

This highly specialized, totipotent cell marked the beginning of each of us as a unique individual. Conversely, sperm and ovum are differentiated parts of other human organisms, each having their own specified function. Upon merging, both cease to exist in their current states, and the result is a new and whole entity with unique behavior toward human maturity.

Similarly, skin cells contain genetic information that can be inserted into an enucleated ovum and stimulated to create an embryo, but only the embryo possesses this self-directed inherent capacity for all human development. Defining Personhood The question of personhood leaves the realm of science for that of philosophy and moral ethics.

Science defines what the preborn is, it cannot define our obligations toward her. After all, the preborn is a very different human entity than those we see around us. Should a smaller, less developed, differently located and dependent being be entitled to rights of personhood and life?

Perhaps the more significant question is: Are small people less important than bigger or taller people? Again, if these factors are not relevant in granting or increasing personhood for anyone past the goal post of birth, neither should they matter where the preborn human is concerned.

One might fairly argue that we do grant increasing rights with skill and age. However, the right to live and to not be killed is unlike the social permissions granted on the basis of acquired skills and maturity, such as the right to drive or the right to vote.

We are denied the right to drive prior to turning 16; we are not killed and prevented from ever gaining that level of maturity. Similarly, consciousness and self-awareness, often proposed as fair markers for personhood, merely identify stages in human development. To say that an entity does not yet have consciousness is to nonetheless speak of that entity within which lies the inherent capacity for consciousness, and without which consciousness could never develop.

Whether the life is cut off in the fourth week or the fourteenth, the victim is one of our species, and has been from the start. Just as one would not throw out green bananas along with rotten bananas though both lack current function as food, one cannot dismiss a fetus who has not yet gained a function, alongside a brain-dead person who has permanently lost that function.

To dismiss and terminate a fetus for having not yet achieved a specified level of development is to ignore that a human being at that stage of human development is functioning just as a human being of that age and stage is biologically programmed to function.

It simultaneously makes us into individuals and members of a group, and thus embeds in us rights-bearing protections. First, what is does not necessarily represent what should be. The fact that social conventions of personhood disregard the preborn human is no surprise, and in fact the very matter in dispute.

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources So much to unpack.
By Mohamed Khodr These terms have been invented to describe the environment created when people are linked continuously through tech devices to other humans and to global intelligence. Teens and young adults have been at the forefront of the rapid adoption of the mobile internet and the always-on lifestyle it has made possible.
Welcome to Reddit, Translated by Richard M. The Loeb Classical Library.
Stay Up To Date Tomas flunks his test … Force Majeure.
Latest Stories The falling numbers are indicative of more than just a lack of conviction by the laity.

Second, birth possesses no such magical powers of transformation. At birth a developing human changes location, begins to take in oxygen and nutrients in a new manner, and begins to interact with a greater number of other humans.

But a simple journey through the birth canal does not change the essential nature of the entity in question. In fact, bio-ethicist Peter Singer agrees with the pro-lifer on this point.Jan 11,  · Welcome to Christian Forums, a forum to discuss Christianity in a friendly surrounding.

Your voice is missing! You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.. We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Abandoning your morals for a chance at life

It is not the kind of argument that states that every life has intrinsic value and should therefore have the chance to live free from oppression.

– m-strasser Aug 12 '16 at I would say, a point of view is only then inherently "false", if it contradicts itself. DEA Ends Investigation of Pain Doctor Lynn Webster, MD In , it came to light that three year’s earlier the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) had opened an investigation of then-president-elect of the American Academy of Pain Medicine (AAPM) Lynn Webster, MD, related to overdose deaths at Dr.

Webster’s Lifetree Pain Clinic in Salt Lake City. Continental Congress Whereas true religion and good morals are the only solid foundations of public liberty and happiness: Resolved, That it be, and it is hereby earnestly recommended to the several states, to take the most effectual measures for the encouragement thereof, and for the suppressing theatrical entertainments, horse racing, gaming, and such other [ ].

It was Mary's inspiration to put the two things together: to realize that man-made life had scary, not benign, implications.

In a nightmare, she saw a man-made creature come to life. Those things seem worth giving up the chance to take a cheap shot at someone I disagree with. We all want our children to inherit a safe world with clean air and water.

We take action to help make.

A Secular Case Against Abortion - Pro-Life Humanists