Who are we doing this versus? Some old news I only just heard about:
The 10 worst colleges for free speech: Campuses were rocked by violent mob censorshipmonitored by bias response teamsplagued by free speech zonesand beset by far too many disinvitation attempts.
Although the number of colleges with the most restrictive speech codes has continued to decline90 percent of schools still maintain codes that either clearly restrict or could too easily be used to restrict free speech.
Today, we present our list of the 10 worst colleges for free speech. As always, our list is presented in no particular order, and it includes both public and private institutions. Public colleges and universities are bound by the First Amendment; the private colleges on this list, though not required by the Constitution to protect student and faculty speech rights, explicitly promise to do so.
This year, that school is DePaul University. Are you a student or faculty member whose free speech rights are imperiled on campus? Submit a case to FIRE. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Troy, N. Rensselaer Student Union Credit: InRPI continued that tradition, working literally day and night to censor students.
One student was charged under a policy barring commercial solicitation for distributing a letter criticizing the administration.
These charges were dropped only after months of criticism from FIRE. Drexel University Philadelphia, Pa.
The trouble for Ciccariello-Maher began on Dec. Drexel initially promised Ciccariello-Maher that he would not face punishment for the tweet, but the red light institution quietly launched an investigation anyway.
FIRE wrote to Drexel on June 2,reminding the university of its commitments to free expression and warning that its investigation of Ciccariello-Maher contradicted those promises.
Rather than admit its mistake, Drexel refused to drop its investigation and then barred Ciccariello-Maher from campus in October, citing threats from those outraged by his tweets.
Just last year, faculty at schools including the University of TampaEssex County CollegeMontclair State UniversityCalifornia State University, Fresnoand Trinity College faced suspensions, investigations, and even firings in response to outrage campaigns.
Harvard University Cambridge, Mass.
Widener Library at Harvard Credit: Harvard did just that, and the blacklist policy to deny certain academic and leadership privileges to members of single-gender groups like sororities, fraternities, and final clubs is still on track to be implemented this semester. First, Harvard rescinded offers of admission from 10 students for sharing joke images in a private group chat on Facebook.That seems different, though, because it requires rejecting one ideology/ingroup, namely Catholicism.
It makes sense that people identifying as Catholic would resent that the Protestants found a way to weaken Catholicism, and apparently people who “took the soup” were ostracized.
Essay about Censorship of the Internet Words | 12 Pages Censorship of the Internet The Internet offers a huge wealth of information, both good and bad. Internet censorship in Australia On 1 January the Broadcasting Services Amendment (Online Services) Bill became law. At the time of its introduction in parliament the bill created a heated debate within the internet community about the needs and the possibilities of .
Essay about Internet Censorship. The Internet is like many great inventions, it has some flaws, but the pros definitely outweigh the cons. The Internet has become an educational tool for students, increased communication, and allowed for knowledge of all subjects to be shared.
Essay Internet Censorship in China. FYC Ruoxuan (Catherine) Yuan Internet Censorship has negative effects on China Censorship in China has gained much attention recently because of the conflict between Google and the Chinese government’s self-censorship policies.
Internet censorship is the control or suppression of what can be accessed, published, or viewed on the Internet enacted by regulators, or on their own initiative. Individuals and organizations may engage in self-censorship for moral, religious, or business reasons, to conform to societal norms, due to intimidation, or out of fear of legal or other consequences.